2004 Southern Conference Softball
Team Statistics
Overall Statistics
2004 Southern Conference Softball
SoCon Overall Statistics (as of Sep 10, 2020)
(All games Sorted by Batting avg)
Team AVG G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB SLG% BB HBP SO GDP OB% SF SH SB-ATT PO A E FLD%
Coll. of Charleston. .309 66 1786 407 552 112 5 60 363 854 .478 208 50 345 0 .393 15 56 37-44 1289 605 85 .957
Elon................ .271 57 1518 196 412 55 6 25 182 554 .365 98 17 243 9 .321 8 50 27-34 1160 522 41 .976
Chattanooga......... .258 70 1742 238 449 61 13 11 218 569 .327 217 23 280 13 .345 14 84 28-38 1409 465 48 .975
UNC Greensboro...... .253 60 1575 229 398 70 3 53 210 633 .402 160 31 366 4 .332 8 27 60-76 1222 624 80 .958
Georgia Southern.... .253 59 1556 188 393 57 7 24 153 536 .344 117 32 302 5 .317 4 50 22-34 1216 478 85 .952
East Tennessee State .249 63 1681 200 418 72 20 31 189 623 .371 114 13 264 6 .300 6 31 43-58 1275 510 66 .964
Furman.............. .208 63 1603 153 333 50 14 5 127 426 .266 121 17 352 8 .270 5 94 49-65 1279 619 78 .961
Appalachian State... .208 61 1561 156 324 55 4 7 131 408 .261 111 20 379 4 .268 3 31 136-168 1246 526 86 .954
Totals.............. .252 13022 3279 72 1573 .353 203 49 63 402-517 4349 .962
499 1767 532 216 4603 1146 2531 .321 423 10096 569
CI - FUR 2, COFC 1, ASU 1.
(All games Sorted by Earned run avg)
Team ERA W-L G CG SHO/CBO SV IP H R ER BB SO 2B 3B HR AB B/Avg WP HBP BK SFA SHA
Georgia Southern.... 1.78 30-29 59 33 14/0 2 405.1 326 160 103 138 376 43 9 22 1522 .214 16 28 1 1 39
Coll. of Charleston. 1.89 43-22 66 40 17/5 1 429.2 343 163 116 140 331 45 5 21 1624 .211 23 16 0 8 53
Chattanooga......... 2.33 44-25 70 49 17/5 6 469.2 438 185 156 94 404 55 8 28 1796 .244 17 14 0 6 44
East Tennessee State 2.52 29-34 63 33 9/0 1 425.0 396 197 153 164 291 57 8 23 1607 .246 21 47 1 12 37
Elon................ 2.75 33-23 57 30 11/1 5 386.2 374 173 152 134 237 49 4 28 1464 .255 13 19 0 5 52
Appalachian State... 2.98 22-39 61 24 5/1 4 415.1 387 224 177 134 221 58 11 37 1587 .244 31 32 0 12 63
UNC Greensboro...... 3.08 30-30 60 40 5/1 2 408.2 445 242 180 132 266 98 7 27 1633 .273 48 18 1 7 58
Furman.............. 3.30 15-48 63 34 3/1 0 426.1 456 270 201 197 304 73 6 20 1677 .272 54 43 0 9 71
Totals.............. 2.57 499 81/14 3366.2 1614 1133 478 206 .245 217 60
246-250 283 21 3165 1238 2430 58 12910 223 3 417
PB - UNCG 32, COFC 22, GSU 20, FUR 16, Elon 15, ASU 11, ETSU 8, UTC 3. Pickoffs - ETSU 3, GSU 2, UTC 1, ASU 1, FUR 1, UNCG 1.
(All games Sorted by Fielding pct)
Team C PO A E FLD% DPs SBA CSB SBA% PB CI
Elon................ 1723 1160 522 41 .976 19 74 21 .779 15 0
Chattanooga......... 1922 1409 465 48 .975 10 50 17 .746 3 0
East Tennessee State 1851 1275 510 66 .964 20 48 16 .750 8 0
Furman.............. 1976 1279 619 78 .961 16 68 27 .716 16 2
UNC Greensboro...... 1926 1222 624 80 .958 21 54 11 .831 32 0
Coll. of Charleston. 1979 1289 605 85 .957 9 41 9 .820 22 1
Appalachian State... 1858 1246 526 86 .954 19 70 17 .805 11 1
Georgia Southern.... 1779 1216 478 85 .952 13 48 12 .800 20 0
Totals.............. 15014 4349 .962 453 .777 4
10096 569 127 130 127
Category Leaders
2004 Southern Conference Softball
SoCon Batting Leaders (as of Sep 10, 2020)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 1 Games 75% of Games 2.0 AB/Game
Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game
Batting avg
-----------
1. Coll. of Charleston. .309
2. Elon................ .271
3. Chattanooga......... .258
4. UNC Greensboro...... .253
5. Georgia Southern.... .253
Slugging pct
------------
1. Coll. of Charleston. .478
2. UNC Greensboro...... .402
3. East Tennessee State .371
4. Elon................ .365
5. Georgia Southern.... .344
On base pct
-----------
1. Coll. of Charleston. .393
2. Chattanooga......... .345
3. UNC Greensboro...... .332
4. Elon................ .321
5. Georgia Southern.... .317
Runs scored
-----------
1. Coll. of Charleston. 407
2. Chattanooga......... 238
3. UNC Greensboro...... 229
4. East Tennessee State 200
5. Elon................ 196
Hits
----
1. Coll. of Charleston. 552
2. Chattanooga......... 449
3. East Tennessee State 418
4. Elon................ 412
5. UNC Greensboro...... 398
Runs batted in
--------------
1. Coll. of Charleston. 363
2. Chattanooga......... 218
3. UNC Greensboro...... 210
4. East Tennessee State 189
5. Elon................ 182
Doubles
-------
1. Coll. of Charleston. 112
2. East Tennessee State 72
3. UNC Greensboro...... 70
4. Chattanooga......... 61
5. Georgia Southern.... 57
Triples
-------
1. East Tennessee State 20
2. Furman.............. 14
3. Chattanooga......... 13
4. Georgia Southern.... 7
5. Elon................ 6
Home runs
---------
1. Coll. of Charleston. 60
2. UNC Greensboro...... 53
3. East Tennessee State 31
4. Elon................ 25
5. Georgia Southern.... 24
Total bases
-----------
1. Coll. of Charleston. 854
2. UNC Greensboro...... 633
3. East Tennessee State 623
4. Chattanooga......... 569
5. Elon................ 554
Total plate appearances
-----------------------
1. Coll. of Charleston. 2115
2. Chattanooga......... 2080
3. East Tennessee State 1845
4. Furman.............. 1840
5. UNC Greensboro...... 1802
At bats
-------
1. Coll. of Charleston. 1786
2. Chattanooga......... 1742
3. East Tennessee State 1681
4. Furman.............. 1603
5. UNC Greensboro...... 1575
Walks
-----
1. Chattanooga......... 217
2. Coll. of Charleston. 208
3. UNC Greensboro...... 160
4. Furman.............. 121
5. Georgia Southern.... 117
Hit by pitch
------------
1. Coll. of Charleston. 50
2. Georgia Southern.... 32
3. UNC Greensboro...... 31
4. Chattanooga......... 23
5. Appalachian State... 20
Strikeouts
----------
1. Appalachian State... 379
2. UNC Greensboro...... 366
3. Furman.............. 352
4. Coll. of Charleston. 345
5. Georgia Southern.... 302
Sac bunts
---------
1. Furman.............. 94
2. Chattanooga......... 84
3. Coll. of Charleston. 56
4. Georgia Southern.... 50
Elon................ 50
Sac flies
---------
1. Coll. of Charleston. 15
2. Chattanooga......... 14
3. Elon................ 8
UNC Greensboro...... 8
5. East Tennessee State 6
Stolen bases
------------
1. Appalachian State... 136
2. UNC Greensboro...... 60
3. Furman.............. 49
4. East Tennessee State 43
5. Coll. of Charleston. 37
Caught stealing
---------------
1. Appalachian State... 32
2. UNC Greensboro...... 16
Furman.............. 16
4. East Tennessee State 15
5. Georgia Southern.... 12
Steal attempts
--------------
1. Appalachian State... 168
2. UNC Greensboro...... 76
3. Furman.............. 65
4. East Tennessee State 58
5. Coll. of Charleston. 44
Grounded into DP
----------------
1. Chattanooga......... 13
2. Elon................ 9
3. Furman.............. 8
4. East Tennessee State 6
5. Georgia Southern.... 5
2004 Southern Conference Softball
SoCon Pitching Leaders (as of Sep 10, 2020)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 1 Games 75% of Games 2.0 AB/Game
Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game
Earned run avg
--------------
1. Georgia Southern.... 1.78
2. Coll. of Charleston. 1.89
3. Chattanooga......... 2.33
4. East Tennessee State 2.52
5. Elon................ 2.75
Opposing bat avg
----------------
1. Coll. of Charleston. .211
2. Georgia Southern.... .214
3. Appalachian State... .244
4. Chattanooga......... .244
5. East Tennessee State .246
Innings pitched
---------------
1. Chattanooga......... 469.2
2. Coll. of Charleston. 429.2
3. Furman.............. 426.1
4. East Tennessee State 425.0
5. Appalachian State... 415.1
Batters struck out
------------------
1. Chattanooga......... 404
2. Georgia Southern.... 376
3. Coll. of Charleston. 331
4. Furman.............. 304
5. East Tennessee State 291
Batters SO out looking
----------------------
1. Georgia Southern.... 144
2. Furman.............. 108
3. Chattanooga......... 106
4. Coll. of Charleston. 98
5. UNC Greensboro...... 86
Wins
----
1. Chattanooga......... 44
2. Coll. of Charleston. 43
3. Elon................ 33
4. Georgia Southern.... 30
UNC Greensboro...... 30
Losses
------
1. Furman.............. 48
2. Appalachian State... 39
3. East Tennessee State 34
4. UNC Greensboro...... 30
5. Georgia Southern.... 29
Saves
-----
1. Chattanooga......... 6
2. Elon................ 5
3. Appalachian State... 4
4. UNC Greensboro...... 2
Georgia Southern.... 2
Runners picked off
------------------
1. East Tennessee State 3
2. Georgia Southern.... 2
3. 4 tied at........... 1
Sac bunts allowed
-----------------
1. Furman.............. 71
2. Appalachian State... 63
3. UNC Greensboro...... 58
4. Coll. of Charleston. 53
5. Elon................ 52
Sac flies allowed
-----------------
1. East Tennessee State 12
Appalachian State... 12
3. Furman.............. 9
4. Coll. of Charleston. 8
5. UNC Greensboro...... 7
Hits allowed
------------
1. Georgia Southern.... 326
2. Coll. of Charleston. 343
3. Elon................ 374
4. Appalachian State... 387
5. East Tennessee State 396
Runs allowed
------------
1. Georgia Southern.... 160
2. Coll. of Charleston. 163
3. Elon................ 173
4. Chattanooga......... 185
5. East Tennessee State 197
Earned runs allowed
-------------------
1. Georgia Southern.... 103
2. Coll. of Charleston. 116
3. Elon................ 152
4. East Tennessee State 153
5. Chattanooga......... 156
Walks allowed
-------------
1. Chattanooga......... 94
2. UNC Greensboro...... 132
3. Appalachian State... 134
Elon................ 134
5. Georgia Southern.... 138
Doubles allowed
---------------
1. Georgia Southern.... 43
2. Coll. of Charleston. 45
3. Elon................ 49
4. Chattanooga......... 55
5. East Tennessee State 57
Triples allowed
---------------
1. Elon................ 4
2. Coll. of Charleston. 5
3. Furman.............. 6
4. UNC Greensboro...... 7
5. 2 tied at........... 8
Home runs allowed
-----------------
1. Furman.............. 20
2. Coll. of Charleston. 21
3. Georgia Southern.... 22
4. East Tennessee State 23
5. UNC Greensboro...... 27
Wild pitches
------------
1. Furman.............. 54
2. UNC Greensboro...... 48
3. Appalachian State... 31
4. Coll. of Charleston. 23
5. East Tennessee State 21
Balks
-----
1. Georgia Southern.... 1
East Tennessee State 1
UNC Greensboro...... 1
Hit batters
-----------
1. East Tennessee State 47
2. Furman.............. 43
3. Appalachian State... 32
4. Georgia Southern.... 28
5. Elon................ 19
Intentional BB allowed
----------------------
1. East Tennessee State 7
UNC Greensboro...... 7
3. Chattanooga......... 5
4. Georgia Southern.... 3
5. 2 tied at........... 2
2004 Southern Conference Softball
SoCon Fielding Leaders (as of Sep 10, 2020)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 1 Games 75% of Games
Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game
Fielding pct
------------
1. Elon................ .976
2. Chattanooga......... .975
3. East Tennessee State .964
4. Furman.............. .961
5. UNC Greensboro...... .958
Chances
-------
1. Coll. of Charleston. 1979
2. Furman.............. 1976
3. UNC Greensboro...... 1926
4. Chattanooga......... 1922
5. Appalachian State... 1858
Putouts
-------
1. Chattanooga......... 1409
2. Coll. of Charleston. 1289
3. Furman.............. 1279
4. East Tennessee State 1275
5. Appalachian State... 1246
Assists
-------
1. UNC Greensboro...... 624
2. Furman.............. 619
3. Coll. of Charleston. 605
4. Appalachian State... 526
5. Elon................ 522
Errors
------
1. Appalachian State... 86
2. Coll. of Charleston. 85
Georgia Southern.... 85
4. UNC Greensboro...... 80
5. Furman.............. 78
Fielding double plays
---------------------
1. UNC Greensboro...... 21
2. East Tennessee State 20
3. Elon................ 19
Appalachian State... 19
5. Furman.............. 16
Stolen bases against
--------------------
1. Elon................ 74
2. Appalachian State... 70
3. Furman.............. 68
4. UNC Greensboro...... 54
5. Chattanooga......... 50
Caught stealing by
------------------
1. Furman.............. 27
2. Elon................ 21
3. Appalachian State... 17
Chattanooga......... 17
5. East Tennessee State 16
Steal attempts against
----------------------
1. Furman.............. 95
Elon................ 95
3. Appalachian State... 87
4. Chattanooga......... 67
5. UNC Greensboro...... 65
Passed balls
------------
1. UNC Greensboro...... 32
2. Coll. of Charleston. 22
3. Georgia Southern.... 20
4. Furman.............. 16
5. Elon................ 15
Catchers interference
---------------------
1. Furman.............. 2
2. Coll. of Charleston. 1
Appalachian State... 1